IS militants killed at least 20 Christian worshippers at St. Elias church in Damascus this morning. This thing that Islam has metastasized into in the last 80 years is the principle enemy of Christ in the world today.
https://www.dw.com/en/syria-deadly-blast-hits-church-in-damascus/a-73000565
Also, please see the two updates I added to the end of the post below.
Here’s a fundamental premise behind everything you’re about to read: Christians have a biblical and spiritual obligation to care about what happens to their brothers and sisters in Christ, no matter where they live on this planet. Okay, let’s go:
I’ve gotten a few questions from friends and relatives about Israel’s war with Iran–and whether the U.S. should involve itself. Coincidentally, around the same time I saw this headline and article on the Roys Report.
Yes, another day, another slaughter of Christians by Muslim extremists in some corner of the world.
By the way, if you don’t follow organizations like Voice of the Martyrs or International Christian Concern you’re not likely to ever hear about these massacres. They’re just not “news.” (Dog bites man.) And when these atrocities do make the news, often the the fact that the perpetrators are Islamists is buried or filtered altogether. (It is a twisted form of political correctness that keeps many legacy news agencies and “journalists” from reporting the jihadist origins of the carnage.
For example, in the Roys Report, you have to read down to the 22nd paragraph of the article to encounter the word “Muslim” or “Islam.” But to the editors’ credit, we do learn in paragraph five that the killers were shouting “Allahu Akbar” allowing the reader to reach the accurate conclusion. In Nigeria, as in countless other places around the planet, if Christians are being slaughtered, it’s Muslim extremists doing the slaughtering. (With a few Hindu incidents sprinkled in.)
Here is just a little sampler platter of events that have occurred over the last 12 months:
Note that last item. You don’t hear the names IS, ISIS or ISIL much anymore, not because the groups don’t exist a but becuase they’ve been rebranded. And dozens of offshoots and imitators of the groups are still very much operating across the Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia. Boko Haram and its splinter groups in Nigeria come immediatelly to mind.
If you follow Christian persecution news sources on social media you discover that hardly a week goes by without a horrific incident that goes unreported and therefore unlamented by the wider world.
Why is this relevant to the current debate about Israel and Iran? Well, as I told a friend who recently texted me for my thoughts about the Tucker Carlson – Ted Cruz debate about the issue:
“The Iranian people are amazing, and if they weren’t suffering under the heel of a death-cult they would be one of the most advanced and prosperous nations on the planet. Some of those long-suffering Persian people are Christians.”
That would be bad enough. But Iran has also been funding and arming brutal Islamic extremist groups all over the world. This is where the issue overlaps Israel.
For decades the Iranians have been funding and arming Hamas in Palestinian areas like Gaza; Hezbollah in Lebanon; and the Houthis in Yemen. Not to mention four different terrorist orgs in Iraq and a couple in Syria.
Not many are old enough to remember how the Carter administration failed to support the secular, modernist monarch in Iran in 1978-’79–the Shah–and allowed the radical Islamists led by the Ayatollah Khomeini–to take control.
What is clear, but what Mr. Carter and lot of human rights idealists/purists in the West didn’t seem to understand, is that in Muslim majority nations, there are only two choices:
There is no third option. The idea that an Islamic majority nation will use democratic processes to create some sort of just and decent society is a fantasy. A delusion. A delusion George W. Bush and many other leaders seem to have entertained.
The oppression of the Iranian people, and all of the death, oppression and slaughter the Mullahs have sponsored over the last 40+ years is, in part, on Jimmy Carter and his naive, idealistic sensibilities. Of course, Shiite Iran is only one half of the Islamic equation in the world.
You can’t understand Middle East geopolitics without understanding the ancient regional conflict betwen the two main strains of Islam–Shiite and Sunni. The split in Islam goes all the way back to the seventh century. Imagine that the blood-soaked split between Protestants and Catholics happened immediately after the resurrection of Christ and you’ll get the general idea.
Everything in the Middle East since the end of World War II has been about the conflict between Sunni Islam (with Saudi Arabia at the head) and Shiite Islam (with Iran at the head). Initially, both sides were all about destroying Israel. Why?:
Because since 1948, Israel has been an island of Western modernity in a sea of medieval Islamic barbarism. THIS is why it has been intolerable to the Islamist, global caliphate mindset.
In other words. Israel is offensive to the Islamists not because it is Jewish but because it is Western.
And there are many Progressives in the U.S. who also despise Western Civilization. (Which, by the way, is “Christian Civilization.” And they despise it, whether they know it or not, precisely because it is Christian. Many Progressives are unaware of the “anti-Christ” spiritual roots of their Progressivism.)
If you are so extraordinarily blessed as to be living in a Western democracy; AND you’ve imbibed deeply of the toxic, anti-Western Civilization, anti-Colonial, 1619 Project-y, Howard Zinn-ian narrative of pale evil European oppression of people of color . . . then the Israel-Palestinian thing overlays perfectly–in spite of a mountain of stubborn facts to the contrary.
Again, the hatred for Israel is rooted in hatred for the West. And a lot of people in the West hate their own culture . . . the culture that has elevanted and advanced everything they claim to value.
No, Christians don’t have total liberty in Israel. But they have far, far more than believers do in Islamic nations. The same is true of Muslims. Arabic/Muslim people in Israel vote, have representatives in the Knesset, and enjoy a culture that is the envy of most of the developing world.
Now back to Iran . . .
Iran–with Russian and China–represents an axis of real-deal evil in this world at this moment. There is no regime in this world so evil or despiciable that Russia and China won’t support it and arm it. In fact, they’re attracted to it. And both are supporting Iran.
And Iran’s relentless quest to obtain nuclear weapons makes it the principal threat to stability and order and modernity in the world. And the biggest threat to Christians in the world.
Israel is doing the dirty work that the U.S. and other Western nations simply don’t have the “huevos” to do. And it’s doing it from a survival motivation. Iran with nuclear weapons is an existential threat to Israel. But it is also a threat to the U.S. and the rest of the civilized world.
All of which is why the best and the brightest in Iran are quietly rooting for Israel and the West in this conflict. They long for the days in which Iran’s great minds can join the progress and blessings of the modern world. And the worst and the dumbest are rooting against Israel and the West.
If you’re rooting against Israel, you’re rooting against humanity, equality, progress, freedom, and civilization. And if you’re rooting for Iran, you’re rooting for the continued oppression of Christians. It’s as simple as that.
From a kingdom (enemies of Christ) standpoint, the Iranian regime has to fall. So does the Putin regime in Russia and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in China. They are all enemies of Christ and in accordance with Psalms 110:1, Hebrews 10:12-13 and 1 Corinthians 15:24-25; they must collapse because they oppress the people of God in the world.
If that is the case, and it is, then the U.S. and Israel are right and good in removing the mullahs of Iran from power.
Again, the spiritual enemies of Christ don’t hate Israel becuse the nation is Jewish, but because it is Western. Just after 9/11 many people rightly recommended reading Samual Huntington’s book Clash of Civilizations. I did. And it explains why it makes sense to support Israel in it fight for survival against Iran.
As Huntington pointed out, there is a thing that can be called “Islamic Civilization.” It is rooted in something very dark and very much counter to human flourishing. (btw, God is for human flourishing.) We here in America live in the flawed but highest expression of Christian Civilization (which is also why it contains History’s greatest level of human flourishing.) This will seem harsh, but if you think Israel is the probem, you have imbibed too deeply of the spirit of anti-Christ.
Within a few hours of my posting this piece, we learned that the U.S. had surgically struck Iran’s capacity to develop nuclear weapons. The world is safer because this happened. Ultimately, the best possible outcome is that the people of Iran rise up and liberate themselves from the theocratic Islamic death cult that has ruled them since the late ’70s.
Here is the straightfoward calculus . . . did last night’s strike make it more likely or less likely that Iran’s long-suffering Christians will see better days ahead. Time will tell. But if the answer turns out to be “more likely” then, in my view, it was an objectively good thing.
As with most of the divisive issues of our times, my position on Israel is complicated and nuanced. And as with most such issues, I don’t have a large “tribe” online. But this post should make clear what I told a friend in a private email: “I wish my fellow believers in America cared at least one-tenth as much about the persecuted Church as they’ve been taught to care about Israel.” It’s possible to think that and still believe support for Israel is the right thing. That’s what I’m trying to communicate in this post.
I can’t believe it’s been nearly 28 years since I picked up a book by Duke Robinson titled: Good Intentions: The Nine Unconscious Mistakes of Nice People.
I read it and benefited from it. A lot. And so I pulled it out about once a year for several years after that. I kept reading it until I felt I’d really absorbed and activated the good advice it contains.
This week I found myself looking for that particular book among my shelves. Not only do I need a refresher course on living life as a chronically nice person, I have a few loved ones that could probably use it as well.
Sadly, somewhere in the decades since then, it must not have survived the cut amid one of my periodic cullings of the book collection. There are only so many bookshelves in the house my gifted interior decorator wife will tolerate. (True story: I once donated eleven boxes of books to a women’s prison. And that was after just one “cull.”)
Don’t get me wrong. I love being a nice person. I have every intention of remaining one. Frankly I don’t think I have much choice. I’m hard-wired for niceness. And on top of that, there’s that whole Fruit of the Spirit thing that we Christians have going on if we cooperate with Him. Organically bearing the fruit of love, kindess, gentleness, patience, and the others just tends to pile niceness on top of niceness.
Besides, there are already too many “not nice” people in world. And as some wise, ancient philospher and bumper-sticker-maker once observed:
“Mean people suck.”
No, all I wanted was to stop making those “unconscious mistakes” that we nice people are so prone to making. And when I read the book, I saw that I was consistently guilty of making five or six of the nine.
So . . . what are those nine “unconscious mistakes” you’re surely wondering. Well since the book has been out of print for a couple of decades, I suppose I’m on solid ground giving you a summary of them. Behold . . .
It’s possible that the word “boundaries” comes up a time or two in his book. In fact, what most of us chronically nice people need desperately are the two “Bs” . . . Boundaries and a Backbone.
None of the advice or techniques for correcting these mistakes requires becoming a jerk or even being perceived as one (a nice person’s worst fear.) But it does require some self-awareness and a willingness to say what you want, calmly express what you felt, and, occasionally, kindly but firmly telling people you love, “no.”
When we fail life’s “boundaries and backbone” tests, we end up silently resenting others and then feeling guilty about feeling the resentment. And then can resent the other person even more for causing us to to feel that yucky guilt. That’s not fair to anyone. No one, and least no one decent and worth your precious time, wants to be resented. We actually do them and ourselves a dissevervice when we make that common nice-person mistake.
Like I said, I’m due for a refresher course. Now off to the used book sites to find a copy.
This aired on TBN’s Praise program a few nights ago. It’s now available on TBN’s streaming platform. Access if free but you will need to surrender your email address by registering at TBNplus.com to view it. The episode is here:
https://www.tbnplus.com/c/s/sMW1pnGB?episodeId=w2lFbw3K&play=1
My friend Dudley Hall graciously invited me to his podcast to disucss a variety of subjects. In this episode, we tackle AI and the “The Singularity” in the light of what the Bible says about the King and His Kingdom. Have a look!
Also see this post: “Are you Ready to Be Disrupted?“
Did it matter how the Savior of the world died? Did it have to be on a cross?
After all, Jesus was accused by the religious establishment of heresy. And heretics were, in accordance with Levitical law, stoned. In fact, the words of Jesus had, on numerous ocassions, prompted the listening scribes and Pharisees to pick up stones. And the fledgling Church’s very first martyr, Stephen, was stoned by an enraged mob for speaking what they believed were heresies—even as a Sanhedrin “enforcer” from Tarsus named Saul looked on approvingly. Why wasn’t Jesus stoned?
Or why not a priestly knife?
After all, Jesus, the “Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” was the living fulfillment of all the types and shadows embodied by the Passover lamb. The thousands of Passover lambs being sacrificed over on the Temple mount the day Jesus was cruciified died by the knife of a Levitical priest. Had Jesus similarly been run through with a Roman sword, or stabbed with a rogue Levite’s knife, would His shed blood have been just as effective in washing away Sin?
As Father Richard John Neuhaus once admitted, our questions about the crucifixion and the cross are only “probings into mystery.” But the Bible gives us clues and insights into this—the greatest and most consequential of all mysteries.
First, the Word of God makes it clear that the shedding of the Messiah’s innocent blood was a vital aspect of His sacrifice. And the Roman process of crucifixion was an appallingly bloody affair. As the writer of Hebrews declares, “without the shedding of blood there is no remission” of sin (9:22). On the eve of His death, Jesus Himself pointed to a cup of wine and said, “… for this is My blood of the covenant, which is being poured out for many for forgiveness of sins.” (Matt. 26:28)
Yes, the role of Jesus’ shed blood cannot be over-emphasized. However, the mission of Jesus was wider and deepr than just solving the Sin-guilt problem. The New Covenant scriptures make it clear that He left Heaven’s splendor and became the Second and Final “Adam” in order to roll back the Curse that descended upon all mankind, indeed upon Creation itself, when the First Adam fell.
And here’s the thing . . .
That fall happened at a tree—the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. And for reasons we may not fully understand this side of eternity, there is something significant about a death on a tree that points back to that Fall and the resultant Curse. In Deuteronomy 21:22-23 we find:
And if a man has committed a crime punishable by death and he is put to death, and you hang him on a tree, his body shall not remain all night on the tree, but you shall bury him the same day, for a hanged man is cursed by God.
The Jews of Jesus day were very attuned to the implications of this passage. They viewed crucifixion as the worst fate that could befall any Jew. Such a person was under a curse and irredeemable. But it was the Apostle Paul who, by divine inspiration and revelation, grasped the full curse-repealing implications of death on a tree. He had those implications in mind when he penned Galatians 3:13: “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.”
Yes, the shedding of that blood—a blood utterly untouched by the stain of sin—was essential to bring about a redemption that could pass legal muster in the Court of Heaven. But a sacrificial death that would once-and-for-all-time roll back the curse . . . ALSO had to be a death on a tree. But that’s not all.
There had to be thorns at that tree because thorns were a God-declared outcome of of that curse’s unfolding. (Gen. 3:18) And it had to be a naked and shameful death because the very first indicator that Adam and Eve had severed their life-sustaining connection to God was their shame-filled realization of their nakedness.
There was no other possible death for that “Seed” promised to Eve. The One whose heel the serpent would bruise. The One who, in His victory over Death, would crush the head of that Serpent of old and make all things new.
Oh, yes. it had to be a cross.
For more video inspiration, please consider subscribing to my YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@DavidAHolland
As anyone who has undertaken a major home remodeling project will attest–the “demo” phase is messy and ugly. (This, no matter how fun Chip Gaines makes “demo” look on TV.) It’s messy and chaotic, but absolutely necessary if something better, upgraded, and improved is going arise.
I’m not exceptionally “prophetic” but I do try to keep my spiritual ears attuned to what the Spirit is saying to me. And back in July, I told the folks on my email list that I believed we—God’s people individually, His Church, and His churches—had entered a season “accelerated transition.” (By the way, if you’re not on my email list, you can remedy that be registering on the home page.)
In the handful of months since, I’ve seen that observation validated in my own life in the cases of many families, institutions, churches and ministries I know. There is a lot of “demo” going on right now. And it feels messy and ugly and chaotic and can feel like things will never look pretty and orderly ever again. But they will.
They will because God has a pen in His hand and isn’t finished writing our chapters. And Jesus, the Head of His Church is:
. . . at [God’s] right hand in the heavenly realms, far above all rule and authority, power and dominion, and every name that is invoked, not only in the present age but also in the one to come. And God placed all things under his feet and appointed him to be head over everything for the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills everything in every way.
Ephesians 1:20-23 TPT
The “demo” phase is part of a process of creative destruction. And I believe this season of a “accelerated transition” also is bringing with it big, long, disruptive season of creative destruction—for individuals, businesses, ministries, and churches.
These disruptions and revelations are NOT “the devil.” They are NOT the enemy persecuting the Church. They are God, refining, restructuring, and rebuilding HIS Church and HIS world.
Some big entities are being “demo-ed” right now (“some,” not all). And here’s the thing. As I told a friend today, “I don’t know details in most of these cases. But I do know that the bigger and wealthier any enterprise gets the more incentives the key stakeholders have to keep the party going . . . no matter what.”
And some of these enterprises are very, very big.
And to another friend this week I texted:
“Spiritually, it is ‘pride’ and a sense ‘ownership entitlement’ that are the enemies here, not {person’s name}. God’s not having it any longer. But something wonderful is waiting on the other side of this season. Something glorious.”
This is not “judgment beginning with the house of God.” This is loving redemptive remodeling. Yes, the “demo” phase has begun. But something much better is coming. And that is God’s end game, because being redemptive lies at the very core of who He is.
My encouragement is this. Be on the side of building what God envisions. Not on the side of what has been. Pride, arrogance, entitlement are getting ripped out to the studs. The Master Architect has something much healthier in His plans.
